Darryl offers a couple of possible explanations for the earlier 17-point lead now appearing to be an anomaly, ” This new poll shows the race closer than the Rasmussen poll closing on September 6th that had Cantwell leading 52% to 35%. Some of the difference may reflect ordinary sampling error; however, the previous poll may have been particularly bad for Mike!™ because of his botched DUI confession.” I might suggest it could also have something to do with the fact that the day AFTER the poll was announced, the media began to talk about a possible lobbyist problem that may have somewhat tarnished the image of our junior senator.
So we are back where we started. We have an incumbent senator who has fallen back under the 50% mark standing almost even with a politically shrewd challenger who has pretty much put his dirtiest laundry out in public and remains standing. Considering that 10% of Democrats in the recent primary chose “other” and that there will be two 3rd party challengers (both running to the left) in the general election, it will be interesting to see where Senator Cantwell goes for those winning votes.
UPDATE:
Apparently David Goldstein over at HorsesAss.org agrees with my assesment - well, sort of......"Assuming my sources are correct, we now have two independent polls, two weeks apart, that peg this race within the margin of error. That’s not a good place for an incumbent to be six weeks before the election."
Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue

2 comments:
Chad did you mean to say Dale Carnege? " Andrew,
Have you ever heard of Andrew Carnegie? Oh well, never mind. Obviously you are more than entitled to your gloating. I might suggest, however, if you wish to point out Hong's reluctance to be a "good loser", you might want to excercise some humility in victory."
I wish you could write more I really agree with your views.
Thanks for your voice!
Ozy
Ozy,
Oops! Thanks for the catch. You are correct; don't know where my head was on that one.
Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue
Post a Comment