Welcome

Peace, Love, and Rock-n-Roll from a proud Lefty, Liberal, Socialist Hippie

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Where the jobs are....or aren't

As someone who has lost two good paying jobs to off-shoring and one more to “foreign acquisitions” I have written more than a few times over the years about the shrinking manufacturing base and the ongoing assault on labor by management and government; including some of the very politicians you might expect to be more supportive, I was especially interested in the article that Rep. Mike Sells (D-38LD) re-posted on Facebook earlier this week.

The article, “Where the jobs are -- and aren't”, written by Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reporter, Ann Belser and published on Sunday is sub-titled, “Shift to service economy reduces number of positions with higher pay”. Belser begins,


The U.S. government counts 2.7 million people working in the fast-food business these days, a 43 percent increase from a decade ago, and hundreds of thousands of jobs have materialized for those working with small children or helping sick people stay in their homes. All those jobs have average wages ranging from $18,000 to $20,000.

The first decade of the 21st century wasn't so great, however, for the workers who do things like assemble engines, drill machines or operate shoe-making machines -- and earn an annual mean wage just above $30,000. More than half the jobs in some manufacturing occupations were lost.”


Belser says that she got her information by comparing the annual Occupational Employment Statistics survey; released each May by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, from this May and May, 1999. The picture painted by the numbers is a clear view of the shift (begun almost certainly during the Reagan years but accelerated with the expansion of the “New World Economy” under Bill Clinton and George W. Bush) from a manufacturing, living wage economy to the current service economy.


Here is a sampling of the data:


“As the number of retail positions grows, there are more people trying to figure out who will buy what. There were three times more market research analysts in 2009 (226,410) than a decade before.

Other changes show the shift from one-income households to two-income households.

Child care employment has increased over the decade by 58 percent to almost 600,000 jobs that pay a median wage of $21,000 a year…

… Personal and home care aides, work that used to be done for sick relatives by family, is also a job category in which the employment has more than doubled to more than 630,000 jobs as people don't have the same time to care for their loved ones. Those workers are earning about $20,000 a year.

The growth in the fast-food sector and other growth seen in restaurants in general is another manifestation of outsourcing household work.

Meanwhile those occupations for people who produce things are in decline.

Over the last decade, the nation has lost more than half of the jobs for people who work forging machines, drilling and boring machines and who assemble engines and other machines -- jobs that earn a bit more than $30,000 a year.

Fewer than 4,000 people now operate shoe-making machines and just 13,000 are operating fabric bleaching and dying machines. Tool and die makers, who make about $48,000 a year, wood pattern makers ($38,000 annually) and book binders (paying $33,000 a year) also have seen huge decreases in employment…”


Belser (I believe rightly) sees the resulting picture as “…a shift to a service economy that has devastated the economic core of traditional middle-class jobs, replacing better-paying jobs with low-level service jobs.” She correctly points out that this is not the first time in our country’s history that we have seen such a dramatic shift in employment patterns by pointing out the shift from an agrarian society to a manufacturing society (over 100 years ago). However, while acknowledging the supply-siders and free traders who paint a rosey picture for consumers, she gives considerable space to an economist from the Center for American Progress.


“A change in the nature of the economy does not mean that there needs to be a wholesale routing of middle class jobs, said Heather Boushey, a senior economist with the Center for American Progress.

When, at the turn of the 20th century, the country went from an agrarian economy to an industrial one: "In the process, we went from a lot of bad jobs that became good jobs done through deliberate policies and organizing."

And, while the Internet and free trade have changed the landscape of the modern economy, she noted that other countries similarly affected by opening borders and new technologies, such as Japan, Germany and other European countries, have not seen the job shift the U.S. has seen.

"They have not seen the same rising in inequality or hollowing out of their middle class," she said.

Ms. Boushey said the decline in the number of people in manufacturing jobs does not mean the nation cannot rebuild its manufacturing base through policies that promote production, or that service workers cannot organize so that service jobs become good jobs.

"We make choices about how we think about our economy, what we are going to promote and not promote," she said.”


And herein lies the rub. While it does not have to be that American workers remain in decline with regard to wages and benefits; the pro-business/anti-labor atmosphere that (in)famously began with Reagan’s firing of the Air Traffic Controllers (sending the strong signal to management that they now had a friend in government) sees us now in a position where even majority Democrat legislatures run away from some of the most basic "labor friendly” legislation. Simple measures that would merely make organizing in the work place more accessible or protect workers from mandatory management propaganda sessions are routinely left off the floor as sacrificial offerings to big business.


As Mike Sells put it when he re-posted the article on his Facebook page,

“…The long, slow slide downward economically that comes from denigrating unions, and off shoring manufacturing work will come back to haunt us. With labor laws broken with impunity, people intimidated on the job from organizing and the private sector only organized at around 7%, the chickens are coming home to roost, so to speak. People are expected to buy and consume goods and services in this society. It can’t be sustained without living wages and benefits. Even old Henry Ford understood that his workers had to make a decent living to be able to afford the cars they were making. ...”


There is a certain amount of promise with the current administration’s vision of new “Green Technology Jobs”. But even the creation of new jobs, as we can see from Ann Belser’s report; does not guarantee living wage jobs. One of the first things we need to do to reverse this trend is to pass the “Employee Free Choice Act” before Congress today. Locally we need to elect more pro-labor representatives who will fight for the working people of our state. And perhaps just as importantly we as working men and women need to defend our fellow workers at every opportunity and start to turn back this tide of anti-unionism that has taken such a firm hold in this country.


Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue

Friday, May 21, 2010

Obama's War

Afghanistan Body Count: 05/21//2010
Americans Killed: 1,080
Americans Wounded: 9,496
Post Obama Inauguration
Americans Killed: 450
http://icasualties.org/
“…We will finish the job…” Pres. Barack Obama

----------------------------


Latest Confirmed Casualties:

*Petty Officer Zarian Wood, 29, of Houston, TX died May 16 in Helmand Province, Afghanistan.

*Cpl. Nicholas D. Paradarodriguez, 29, of Stafford, VA died May 16 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Staff Sgt. Adam L. Perkins, 27, of Antelope, CA died May 17 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Col. John M. McHugh, 46, of West Caldwell, NJ died May 18 in Kabul, Afghanistan.

*Lt. Col. Paul R. Bartz, 43, of Waterloo, WI died May 18 in Kabul, Afghanistan.

*Lt. Col. Thomas P. Belkofer, 44, of Perrysburg, OH died May 18 in Kabul, Afghanistan.

*Staff Sgt. Richard J. Tieman, 28, of Waynesboro, PA died May 18 in Kabul, Afghanistan.

*Spc. Joshua A. Tomlinson, 24, of Dubberly, LA died May 18 in Kabul, Afghanistan.

*Lance Cpl. Patrick Xavier Jr., 24, of Pembroke Pines, FL died May 18 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Staff Sgt. Shane S. Barnard, 38, of Desmet, SD died May 19 in Zabul Province, Afghanistan.


Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue

Thursday, May 20, 2010

When the enemy of my enemy is.....Tom Coburn?

From David Swanson, writing at War is a Crime (formerly “AfterDowningStreet.org):

Senator Threatens War Funding Filibuster

WASHINGTON - Sen. Tom Coburn (R- OK) is committed to opposing a supplemental spending bill that includes $33.5 billion to escalate war in Afghanistan, unless the funds to pay for it are found.

On May 10 Coburn wrote to his colleagues asking for their support for an amendment that would offset the new spending in this bill with cuts elsewhere. Coburn's communications director John Hart assured me that the senator intends to oppose the supplemental spending bill unless such an amendment is passed…

…Coburn, Hart said, wants to give the Democrats a chance to pay for the war, something that some leading Democrats have said in the past year that they want to do. Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) and House Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-WI) said six months ago that they would not pass any more war funding without creating a "war tax" to pay for it; they proposed legislation to do just that. Obey and President Obama are also among those who have previously vowed not to use "emergency" supplemental spending bills anymore… [Emphasis - TLS]

…Most members of Congress who speak against wars, usually Democrats, tend to fund the wars they "oppose" on the grounds that not to do so is to "oppose the troops." Republicans in the House dismissed this criticism last June when they all voted against the previous war supplemental. Coburn dismissed it as well in his May 10th letter, printed in full below:




May 10, 2010

Dear Colleague,

I appreciate your support for the effort to pay for the $18 billion cost of H.R. 4851, the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 approved by the Senate earlier this month. I am once again asking for your support to pay for the cost of legislation expected to be considered by Congress in the coming weeks.

The Senate is expected to consider yet another "emergency" spending bill in the coming weeks. The bill could cost as much as $70 billion and will contain the annual supplemental war appropriations as well as tens of billions of dollars for a variety of other unrelated purposes, none of which will be paid for with reductions in other federal spending. Without question, we must fully meet the needs of our military men and women with the equipment and supplies they need to win and return home. But we must do so responsibly, by offsetting the full cost of the war efforts with cuts to lower-priority federal spending. As you know, on February 12, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act (PAYGO). In the weeks following its enactment, the Senate has repeatedly ignored the spirit of PAYGO by borrowing $173 billion to cover the costs of new spending rather than paying for it by cutting lower priority spending. Just over a year ago, the national debt was $10.6 trillion. Today, it is $12.9 trillion, and every American owes more than $41,000.

With the federal government borrowing 43 cents for every dollar we spend, our spending is on an unsustainable course. I will, therefore, do everything I can to ensure Congress pays for the annual supplemental spending bill and plan to offer an amendment to offset the full amount of the legislation. I am open to all offset suggestions and would appreciate your support when the pay for amendment is put before the Senate for a vote.

Time and time again, Congress waits until the last minute to consider important legislation and then declares the billions of dollars in costs as “emergency” as a way to avoid making the tough decisions required to pay for the price tag. Congress can continue to borrow billions of dollars by declaring a bill an emergency to avoid paying for it today, but eventually the cost must be paid. Our nation’s $12.9 trillion debt is endangering our financial recovery, the future of our children and grandchildren who will be left paying for the bills we are incurring today, our national security, and the very freedoms of men and women in uniform are fighting to protect and preserve. That is why the real “emergency spending” is this type of irresponsible spending that is creating a true emergency for the future of our nation.

Again, I appreciate your support in the past and I hope I can count on you again as I do whatever I can to help restore fiscal discipline in Washington by forcing Congress to pay for the costs of all new spending.

Sincere Regards,
Tom A Coburn, M.D.
U.S. Senator



I have been writing on the immoral and unethical practice of “off-budget” funding our military interventionism via “emergency supplemental” since this Blog was created. I have lobbied my congressional delegation to put an end to this practice. Tom Coburn is a “social-conservative” ass. But he is finding his way into my heart today.


Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue

Monday, May 17, 2010

Be Afraid




Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Labor Enters 2010 Campaign Mode with Warning Shot at "Anti-Labor" Dems

On Saturday, May 15th delegates to the Washington State Labor Council (WSLC) met at the labor organization’s C.O.P.E. (Committee on Political Education) convention to vote on their endorsements for the 2010 campaign. While many have seen this event as a sort of kumbaya moment for Labor and incumbent Democrats in the past, recent legislative setbacks for Labor and the emergence of the new “DIME-PAC”; established to more effectively target labor friendly candidates, helped to produce more than a couple of surprises. The shift in Labor’s approach was explained in a recent report by WSLC Political Director, Benjamin Lawver entitled, “Things have changed” published on the organization’s website.

“After the 2009 session, when labor’s agenda was not only ignored but also attacked by the Democratic majority caucuses, the Washington State Labor Council’s affiliated unions instituted a complete review of the organization’s political program.

One of the key changes adopted was to establish a more comprehensive system of evaluating the performance of incumbent state legislators, given that voting records don’t always explain who is truly advocating for working families or opposing their interests. This is necessary because it has become common practice for caucus leaders to "protect" their members by either denying votes on important working family legislation or by blocking recorded roll-call votes on the floor.

That’s why, beginning this year, the Washington State Labor Council’s Legislative Voting Records will also include candidate scores for bill sponsorship, caucus and floor advocacy, and community support for labor’s activities. These additional scores, along with the local-level questionnaire, interview and recommendation process conducted by the Central Labor Councils, will all be considered by delegates considering WSLC election endorsements at our C.O.P.E. (Committee on Political Education) Convention on May 15 and any additional endorsements that may occur at the WSLC Constitutional Convention on Aug. 9-12 in Tacoma.”


In his report, Lawver also goes on to explain the purpose of WSLC’s new “DIME-PAC”.


“In the past, the WSLC and many of its affiliates have made significant contributions to caucus campaign committees and to incumbent legislators who were not facing serious election challenges. Those contributions are often used by caucus leadership to fund activities that benefit individual legislators who work against the interests of our members.

To make sure that only those legislators who stand up for working families receive our financial support, the WSLC created the "Don’t Invest In More Excuses" Political Action Committee (DIME PAC) for unions to target campaign contributions more strategically.”


Perhaps nowhere in the state was the impact of these changes felt more significantly than in Snohomish County where the three incumbent Democratic State Senators (Paull Shin - 21LD, Jean Berkey – 38LD, Steve Hobbs – 44LD) seeking re-election were passed over by the Labor delegates. The one thing that all three have in common that would explain their Labor snubbing is their shared membership in the recently formed “Roadkill Caucus”. The caucus, founded late in the 2010 legislative session by Sen. Hobbs, was described by WSLC President, Rick Bender, in a recent post for the WSLC Legislative Report:

“…But this year, something different emerged, masquerading as moderate. It’s a group of Democrats calling themselves the Roadkill Caucus. They espouse a pro-corporate, anti-government agenda. They use the same rhetoric Republicans use about Washington having a horrible business climate, about the need to "reduce government's footprint," and even labeling their fellow party members as "too liberal." They pit constituencies against each other -- rural areas vs. Seattle -- in open defiance of the party's theme of "One Washington."

True moderates espouse their party’s traditional values but occasionally disagree with their leaders’ positions and agenda. The Roadkill Caucus is a group of lawmakers attempting to move their party’s already-centrist agenda to the right, in open opposition to their party’s base constituencies…”


While Shin and Berkey are currently running unopposed (where the lack of a Labor endorsement may not have any effect on their re-election bids), Hobbs not only faces two Republican challengers but also a re-match with his 2006 Democratic Primary opponent, Lillian Kaufer. In a total reversal of fortune from that year, Kaufer walked away Saturday with the sole endorsement of the WSLC for the position of 44th LD State Senator. In 2006 it was Kaufer with all the backing of the local and county Democratic Party organizations along with the backing of regional environmental and other Progressive groups. Many believe that it was the massive GOTV effort on the part of the WSLC however that turned the tide in Hobbs’ 600 plus winning vote margin in the primary.



The other Snohomish County WSLC endorsements are as follows:

 LD-01
House Pos. 1 -- Derek Stanford
House Pos. 2 -- Luis Moscoso
 LD-21
House Pos. 1 -- Mary Helen Roberts
House Pos. 2 -- Marco Liias
 LD-32
House Pos. 1 -- Cindy Ryu
Senate -- Maralyn Chase
 LD-38
House Pos. 1 -- John McCoy
House Pos. 2 -- Mike Sells
 LD-44
House Pos. 1 -- Hans Dunshee

The remainder of the Congressional, State-wide, Legislative, and Ballot Initiative endorsements can be found on the WSLC website here: http://www.wslc.org/reports/2010/May/15.htm



Peace
Chad (The Left) Shue

Obama's War

Afghanistan Body Count: 05/16//2010
Americans Killed: 1,071
Americans Wounded: 9,496
Post Obama Inauguration
Americans Killed: 441
http://icasualties.org/
“…We will finish the job…” Pres. Barack Obama

----------------------------

Latest Confirmed Casualties:

*Lance Cpl. Joshua M. Davis, 19, of Perry, IA died May 7 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Lance Cpl. Christopher Rangel, 22, of San Antonio, TX died May 6 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Capt. Kyle A. Comfort, 27, of Jacksonville, AL died May 8 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Spc. Jeremy L. Brown, 20, of McMinnville, TN died May 9 at Contingency Outpost Zerok, Afghanistan.

*Cpl. Kurt S. Shea, 21, of Frederick, MD died May 10 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Cpl. Jeffery W. Johnson, 21, of Tomball, TX died May 11 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Sgt. Kenneth B. May, Jr., 26, of Kilgore, TX died May 11 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Sgt. Donald J. Lamar II, 23, of Fredericksburg, VA died May 12 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Sgt. Joshua D. Desforges, 23, of Ludlow, MA died May 12 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Spc. Denis D. Kisseloff, 45, of Saint Charles, MO died May 14 at Forward Operating Base Shank, Afghanistan.


Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue

Saturday, May 08, 2010

Obama's War

Afghanistan Body Count: 05/08/2010
Americans Killed: 1,060
Americans Wounded: 9,496
Post Obama Inauguration
Americans Killed: 430
http://icasualties.org/
“…We will finish the job…” Pres. Barack Obama

----------------------------

Latest Confirmed Casualties:

*Lance Cpl. Thomas E. Rivers Jr., 22, of Birmingham, AL died April 28 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Sgt. Grant A. Wichmann, 27, of Golden, CO died April 24 at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C., of wounds sustained March 12 at Out Post Bari Alai, Afghanistan.

*Sgt. Nathan P. Kennedy, 24, of Claysville, PA died April 27, near Quarando Village, Afghanistan.

*1st Lt. Salvatore S. Corma, 24, of Wenonah, NJ died April 29 at Forward Operating Base Bullard, Afghanistan.

*Airman 1st Class Austin H. Gates Benson, 19, of Hellertown, PA died May 3 near Khyber, Afghanistan.

*Master Sgt. Mark W. Coleman, 40, of Centerville, WA (33rd Washingtonian) died May 2 at Khakrez, Afghanistan.

*1st Lt. Brandon A. Barrett, 27, of Marion, IN died May 5 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

*Spc. Eric M. Finniginam, 26, of Colonia, Federated States of Micronesia, died May 1 at Forward Operating Base Blessing, Afghanistan.

*Spc. Wade A. Slack, 21, of Waterville, ME died May 6 at Jaghatu, Afghanistan.

*Lance Cpl. Richard R. Penny, 21, of Fayetteville, AR died May 6 in Helmand province, Afghanistan.


Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue